The Ethics
of sources ( Working with video and open source tools)
( This is the first post in a series of 7 based on the online talks and discussions that I was asked to do as part of an online residency with Hackn3t | hacklab01 here https://hacklab01.org/hackn3t from 22- 28th June 2020 )
Introduction
The general theme I’ve chosen for this series of talks /
demonstrations is ‘The ethics of sources’ an exploration of
finding sources to work with from online or older legacy media and
demonstrations of techniques that I use on an everyday basis in my
own work and some of the Ethical considerations and consequences that stem from that .I should also say that all work and programs used in these presentations are being run from a Dell 9010 desktop running Linuxmint 18.3 - some of the programs shown have windows or mac os versions or equivalent. all are open source. Get linux mint here - https://linuxmint.com/
We swim in an ocean of information. Just as every desktop is a
metaphor – the desktop is never real, the files it holds are never
real. We move in a space which does not exist , pretending it does .
The Internet is the same , as is the content we find there , we can
experience it and interact with it and as neither places are real or seperate we
can cross between the two and bring back content because in the
digital there is no barrier between here and there owned and
non-owned , each is an extension of the other .
A video can look like this
But it can also look like this
And it can sound like this
I want to show how the choice of source can decide its final form
because of its format or content. When I look at a video source for
use in my work I also look for what codec it is originally encoded in
, what wrapper ( By ‘Format’ I mean what codec or container
it is wrapped in, for example h264 in an mp4 container or something
like xvid or zmbv in avi.
By ‘Content’ I mean whether there is movement or perhaps whether
it is in black and white or colour. If black and white what kind of
space , outline and shadow is there. If the source is lofi is it
grainy and artifact prone ( h264 vs mpeg vs msvideo1 vs h261) as a quick
example this is the same file encoded in those 4 formats
H264
Mpeg2 at a low bit rate
From the dawn of time - Msvideo1
H261 ( 352x288)
As you will notice even though this is the exact same film clip encoded using the same software ( ffmpeg) the quality that each codec gives to appearance is quite different .
I also want to show how various techniques can be suited to specific
material. During this first talk I will source film,
news footage from live broadcast, You-tube content and from live
capture and subsequently distress and recreate these in different
ways over the course of subsequent days to end in a final live real
time mixed film performance using the techniques covered.
I also want to examine the reasons for and the ethics/consequences
of sourcing and reusing found material and our responsibilities to
the material from an open source and creative commons
aspect and talk a little about copyright and my attitudes towards it
and how that relates to remix culture and Glitch art in particular.
One of the distinguishing features of glitch art is that arising from
the web and net art it feeds on online content for its source
material – it lives within the screen. As a painter I took my
source material from real life. As a glitch artist where do i get my
sources from lets go to one of the primary resources I use,
( I should add there is some controversy around The internet Archive at the moment , mainly pushed by the usual villains trying to hoover up and control all content for their own profit . Some films uploaded to the archive are also claimed to be public domain when in fact they are not , but this is no reason to go after The internet Archive in an effort to close it down in the interests of copyright-holders as there their interests are quite often against the interests of the common good)
So lets load up archive.org to show what sort of resources are there and then start picking .
So, lets see what we can find on archive.org, what I mainly look for are scifi,
horror and film noir, I'm a big fan of film noir. I'm looking for
something that isn't too long, the longer the film the longer it
takes to re-encode – considerations you have to consider when
working like this is how fast is your computer and how long will
each format take to encode, if we are transcoding ( changing from one codec to another ie h264 to h261) generally its
quicker to transcode small sections of video rather than whole video.
So what am I looking for here ? Something short preferably black and
white with movement and a sharpness too it , with space and outline
and high contrast. If I'm looking for colour I'm probably looking for
wide-screen – these are choices too make as well , wide-screen v’s
4:3, wide-screen has a lot of detail, the more detail the wilder the
glitches usually but 4:3 I like a lot more as its a more contained space - often older black and white films are only available in 4:3 ratio as well .
If we look at this film we can see its quite grainy , a bit lo-fi ,
now that could work well if I want a blocky and grimy look to the end
result , lets take that one , download it with transmission ( a bit
torrent client) as archive.org supports bit torrent . Get transmission here - https://transmissionbt.com/
I'll check over what I can download in – probably go for xvid as thats
handy for datamoshing and its just a handy format.
Transmission in action
Looking at video to check out its graininess
Now while that's downloading I will look for
something in black and white lets look in film noir I spot a film called 'I love
trouble' that sounds good lets look at that and then download it
I love trouble
As I flick through these videos you can see
if we scroll down a bit that most if not all of the movies hosted on
archive.org are public domain ( though as stated before some may not be , check the comments below each movie ) .
Yes I could use a pirated torrent of newer film as material but for the longer
works I make I prefer to use public domain films because it avoids
problems with things like copyright strikes on YouTube and copyright
does start to become an issue when you make work and upload it even
though the internet seems to be a place you can just take what you
want , if you want to present unique works made out of the building
blocks of old films then its best to err on the safe side unless of
course we are making a political point or referencing current events
– more of that later when we get into live capture.
We could also download porn
Glitch art has a
big place within it for what is know
as erotic glitch, if
one of the defining needs of glitch art is for movement for data-
moshing then porn has it all . And its everywhere. One of the best
examinations and uses of porn in glitch art has been by Dom Barra
But
the prevalence and ease of access to porn can also be
ethically problematical ( as well as being an insta ban on facebook for daring to share a nipple - but lets not ban those Trump white power videos eh - Facebooks hypocrisy can be quite chilling) content hosted in those places has
sometimes been found to be revenge porn or non-consensual so when
downloading material to work with we have to check our ethics . Is
it exploitative , is it consensual, is it uploaded with the
permission of those involved ( revenge porn) , by using it are we
just continuing a cycle of exploitation of those already exploited.
We could also lift videos from say, YouTube if we wanted to be a
bit more current and reflect trends or styles or use something for political commentary purposes – so lets go to you
tube and see what we can find there .I
have a thing about Russian witch house at the moment so lets download
some of that To do that we will need to use the command line and this handy python
script youtube-dl
Which works like this.
Download youtube-dl here https://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/index.html
Now
that video at
first glance doesn’t seem to have much
movement in it so lets just find another one to compare it
with when we come to datamoshing and hexediting it
, maybe some dancing i don’t know this maybe ?
You will notice in all of these that I have left out the sound, and I
haven’t uploaded the original video, just a video of me showing the downloading , well one sure way of getting
your work taken down and a copyright strike on YouTube is to include
original video and sound and I sure as hell don't want to allow some
company to monetize the viewing of one of my videos through
partnering so Ive taken the original sound off and the video as seen
are played and recorded on the desktop so there are a couple of
layers of obfuscation to keep ahead of the content police – not a
problem once you’ve actually worked on the video but at this stage
it is . Just to emphasize here , I'm not trying to pirate the original content I'm sourcing material in much the same way as a collage artist would , its the scaffolding I'm going to build something around not the thing in itself.
Cheese-webcambooth common to most Linux Distributions here https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Cheese
And last but not least , one I use most of all these days because its so flexible is obs-studio find that here https://obsproject.com/
Now we could also make our own videos – go out and film something –
I don’t do a lot of that , I used to when I started getting into
circuitbending.
As well as being able to do capture from webcams or capture cards
with processing you can distort video in real time with interesting
effects like slit scan and time displacement and spatio-temporal
disturbance , as well as being able to capture a series of stills
which can later be turned into video after maybe hex editing or
running through the glic codec , but thats for a different day .
capture from webcam using Processing
And if we cant use youtube-dl or torrents or capture cards or webcams
to capture what we see on the screen video we can always
screencapture using say gtk-recordmydesktop ( so for now we will do
it quick and dirty with recordmydesktop )
so there are also certain questions we can ask in the light of what
I’ve been explaining and showing .
The
first of course is how ethical is this ( the ethics of sources
remember) to simply take a source from on-line
and turn it into something new , at what point does a work stop being
derivative and start becoming unique in itself .
Firstly
I do acknowledge that copyright exists (
as I’ve already noted the audio in the video segments I’ve shown
is muted to get around YouTube copyright bots – my original
intention was to do this series of presentations/ demonstrations live
from my desktop , showing a typical working day of gathering material
and working on it with insights into how and why I do it but
bandwidth problems and dysfunctional broadband companies put paid to
that and I had to use youtube to upload this sequence of videos which
describe some of my search processes )
but in the on-line
environment that argument becomes moot, everything is in one way or
another copyable
or rippable – either through
software or hardware .
Ethically
I don't
want to steal somebody else's
work and present it as my own , thats basically wrong, but I have no
problem taking a digital medium and making something from it
as a framework in the same way that i would in the past throw down a
large number of shapes and forms onto canvas until i reached the
point where something new arises from that – I see taking on-line
stuff in the same way – I choose what I choose carefully looking
for movement or textures that I know might work with my methods and
proceed from there , sometimes traces of the original sneak out but
so distorted and abused that they are in themselves something new and
unique .
I
also feel a responsibility when sharing what I do to share it under
creative commons terms , on-line is where I live , it is an ocean of
content and software that I can take from but I must also give back –
I must allow my work to be shared and reused under the loosest of
terms – in someways its a two way conversation with the medium
that is the net to take you have to give back .
There
is also a responsibility to the material ( how so – political moral
technical ? ) if I'm using news material there is I feel a
responsibility on my part not to re-edit or misinterpret political
themes , not to further hate or prejudice of any kind .
I
make my work on the back of software that I'm allowed to use for free
and to give to others free , to change and use as I will as long as I
grant those same rights to others , and I see my work in the same way
. Without that software I would not be able to make the work that I
do , id be stuck with basic windows systems and wandering how to pay
for video editing software or image editing software or even
something as basic as video playback software all on hardware I
already own .
All
the software that I use is free and open-source and its from that
philosophy that my own attitudes arise but also seeing the uses and
abuses that traditional art has been put to , the unique object , the
investment vehicle art of gallery stars like Hirst and Koons , the
exploitation of artists such as Jean-Michel Basquiat and the gate
keeper mentality of the art establishment – far better to publish
my work on-line and allow anyone to use it and reuse it than to feed
into a system which has become just another arm of investment banking
– the power is the idea , the power to give away and the power to
pass on ideas and techniques that empower others who may never have
thought of themselves as artists before – Remix , reuse , recycle
and grant others the right to do like wise.